<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion &amp; Lucene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene</link>
	<description>The opposite of every great idea is another great idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/?p=75#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Excuse my ignorance, but is Lucene compatible with IIS (since it is an Apache product)? We are looking for an alternative to Verity, but are tied to IIS....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse my ignorance, but is Lucene compatible with IIS (since it is an Apache product)? We are looking for an alternative to Verity, but are tied to IIS&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/?p=75#comment-3</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken ColdFusion Standard allows for 100k records, whilst ColdFusion Enterprise is 250k. Whatever the number I believe Lucene is a better bet and indeed I know a number of organisations which have chosen this route over the native verity.

Unfortunately I haven&#039;t seen any new projects on ColdFusion and Lucene, which may be a call-to-action for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken ColdFusion Standard allows for 100k records, whilst ColdFusion Enterprise is 250k. Whatever the number I believe Lucene is a better bet and indeed I know a number of organisations which have chosen this route over the native verity.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t seen any new projects on ColdFusion and Lucene, which may be a call-to-action for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/?p=75#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Definitely saving this bookmark to my del.icio.us. I&#039;m at the point where I&#039;m going to be considering which search technology to use with my CF app. The record limit that comes along with CF&#039;s Verity always makes me nervous. (Isn&#039;t it something like 100,000 records on Enterprise?)

Are there any other CF+Lucene projects that have surfaced since you wrote this a year ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely saving this bookmark to my del.icio.us. I&#8217;m at the point where I&#8217;m going to be considering which search technology to use with my CF app. The record limit that comes along with CF&#8217;s Verity always makes me nervous. (Isn&#8217;t it something like 100,000 records on Enterprise?)</p>
<p>Are there any other CF+Lucene projects that have surfaced since you wrote this a year ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

