<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion &#038; Lucene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene</link>
	<description>The opposite of every great idea is another great idea</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene#comment-4041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/?p=75#comment-4041</guid>
		<description>Excuse my ignorance, but is Lucene compatible with IIS (since it is an Apache product)? We are looking for an alternative to Verity, but are tied to IIS....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse my ignorance, but is Lucene compatible with IIS (since it is an Apache product)? We are looking for an alternative to Verity, but are tied to IIS&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/?p=75#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>If I'm not mistaken ColdFusion Standard allows for 100k records, whilst ColdFusion Enterprise is 250k. Whatever the number I believe Lucene is a better bet and indeed I know a number of organisations which have chosen this route over the native verity.

Unfortunately I haven't seen any new projects on ColdFusion and Lucene, which may be a call-to-action for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken ColdFusion Standard allows for 100k records, whilst ColdFusion Enterprise is 250k. Whatever the number I believe Lucene is a better bet and indeed I know a number of organisations which have chosen this route over the native verity.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t seen any new projects on ColdFusion and Lucene, which may be a call-to-action for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/coldfusion-lucene#comment-2970</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/?p=75#comment-2970</guid>
		<description>Definitely saving this bookmark to my del.icio.us. I'm at the point where I'm going to be considering which search technology to use with my CF app. The record limit that comes along with CF's Verity always makes me nervous. (Isn't it something like 100,000 records on Enterprise?)

Are there any other CF+Lucene projects that have surfaced since you wrote this a year ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely saving this bookmark to my del.icio.us. I&#8217;m at the point where I&#8217;m going to be considering which search technology to use with my CF app. The record limit that comes along with CF&#8217;s Verity always makes me nervous. (Isn&#8217;t it something like 100,000 records on Enterprise?)</p>
<p>Are there any other CF+Lucene projects that have surfaced since you wrote this a year ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
