<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Engineering &#8230; The Other Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/software-engineering-the-other-way/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/software-engineering-the-other-way</link>
	<description>The opposite of every great idea is another great idea</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Brooks-Bilson</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/software-engineering-the-other-way#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Brooks-Bilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwhatley.co.uk/software-engineering-the-other-way#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>Simon,

Here's an interesting follow-up on how people can get hung up implementing an iterative development process to the point it is actually a small series of waterfall developments (incremental vs. iterative).  Interesting perspective:

http://gojko.net/2007/12/04/waterfall-trap/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting follow-up on how people can get hung up implementing an iterative development process to the point it is actually a small series of waterfall developments (incremental vs. iterative).  Interesting perspective:</p>
<p><a href="http://gojko.net/2007/12/04/waterfall-trap/" rel="nofollow">http://gojko.net/2007/12/04/waterfall-trap/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
